Pam made an oral contract with Katie to purchase Katie's house for $200,000. Later, Pam refuses to pay Katie the $200,000. There are five witnesses who will testify that they heard Pam agree with Katie to purchase her house for $200,000. Katie sues Pam for breach of contract.
a. Katie wins. The witnesses will establish her case by a preponderance of the evidence.
b. Katie wins. The Statute of Frauds has been repealed everywhere.
c. Pam wins. The Statute of Frauds prevents Katie from winning this claim.
d. Pam wins. All contracts have to be in writing, and this one was oral.