Which of these explains the relationship between logos and fallacies?
There is no relationship.
Fallacies, which rely on faulty logic, can make an appeal to logos less effective.
Fallacies which rely on pathos are the exact opposite of logos.
Using a fallacy can be damaging to logos.
Using a fallacy can damage one's ethos, which is dependent upon logos.
Fallacies, which rely on faulty logic, can make an appeal to logos less effective" would be the best option since telling untruths of any kind, regardless of intent, almost always undermine the argument you wish you make.
Fallacies, which rely on faulty logic, can make an appeal to logos less affective. Logos is a form of writing meant to appeal to logic. By using fallacies (false facts/inaccurate logic), your audience may be less likely to believe your argument.
