BIJDZ5071 BIJDZ5071
  • 10-09-2017
  • Social Studies
contestada

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

Respuesta :

SeoJoon15
SeoJoon15 SeoJoon15
  • 21-09-2017
The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

A pancake recipe calls for 4 cups of flourcand 3 cups milk.Does a recipe calling for 2 cups flour and 1.5 cups milk use the same ratio of flour to milk?
0.197 as a fraction in simplest form
How is Brazil attempting to slow the effects of global warming?
which two physical properties allow a mixture to be separated by chromatography 1) solubility and molecular polarity 2) malleability and thermal conductivity
What did Charles horton cooley add to the field of sociology
70 p x 2 1/2 = how many pounds
The Maya was the most advanced of the early American civilizations. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.
What does The Primary Chronicle say about Rurik and the origin of Novgorod?
what is 37 /40 - 26 /50 equals
what happens to a gummy bear when placed in a beaker of vinegar?