emilyc200119
contestada

in Katz v united states, the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without warrant violated the defendant’s:

a: freedom of assembly
b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure
c: protection against double jeopardy
d: right to avoid self-incrimination

Respuesta :

mynameisjeff941
The answer would be B: protection against unreasonable search and seizure.

Hope this answer helped!

the answer is: b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure

Protection against unreasonable search and seizure make it illlegal for the law enforcment to conduct a search in citizens'  property without having proper warrant. The court ruled out that public phone is technically citizens' property since it's being maintained using citizen's tax money.